About Us
Our Blog
Contact UsAlmetrics: A bibliometric review from 2015 to 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47909/anis.978-9916-9760-0-5.56Keywords:
Altmetrics, Bibliometrics, scientometrics, science evaluation, academic impact, social impactAbstract
A bibliometric analysis is carried out around the scientific production on Altmetrics between the years 2015-2020 in the Scopus database. For this, the present study consists of two parts, in the first, a review of the literature on Altmetrics is made, where the main characteristics are pointed out. In the second part, the results of the bibliometric analysis are presented, in which a total of 714 publications are analyzed based on indicators such as the number of publications per year and journals, topics, affiliations, and collaboration between researchers and countries. To obtain other indicators for the analysis of the journals, the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) was consulted, where indicators such as the impact factor and the quartile that each journal belongs to were obtained. The scientific production on Altmetrics has a significant growth each year and this growing trend tends to increase. There is a variety of disciplines in journals that publish around Altmetrics, not remaining exclusively in the library or information science journals.
Downloads
References
Arévalo, J. A., & Vázquez, M. V. (2016). Altmetrics y alfabetización científica. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación, 12(1), 14-29.
Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y
Erdt, M., Nagarajan, A., Sin, S. C. J., & Theng, Y. L. (2016). Altmetrics: an analysis of the state-of-the-art in measuring research impact on social media. Scientometrics, 109(2), 1117-1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2077-0
González‐Valiente, C., Pacheco‐Mendoza, J., & Arencibia‐Jorge, R. (2016). A review of altmetrics as an emerging discipline for research evaluation. Learned Publishing, 29(4), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1043
Haustein, S. (2016). Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics, 108(1), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9.
Maricato, J. D. M., & Vilan Filho, J. L. (2018). The potential for altmetrics to measure other types of impact in scientific production: academic and social impact dynamics in social media and networks. Information Research, 23(1). Recuperado de: https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/32082
Mukherjee, B., Subotić, S., & Chaubey, A. K. (2018). And now for something completely different: the congruence of the Altmetric Attention Score’s structure between different article groups. Scientometrics, 114(1), 253-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2559-8
Ortega, J. L. (2018). Disciplinary differences of the impact of altmetric. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny049
Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874
Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Betzabeth Yajaira Avendaño Espinoza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, adapting, transforming and building upon the material as long as the license terms are followed.
